Friday 8 February 2013

If you hated having an uncle monkey, you will not Adam and Eve this…

Creationists the world over gave a sigh of dismay as scientists revealed a dreamt-up image of how the first ‘placental’ mammal may have looked. ‘Placental’ mammals are those mammals that give birth to live young, such as humans, rats, dogs and, whisper it: monkeys. This common ancestor has been ‘discovered’ (or doodled if you’re of the creationist viewpoint) after examining the traits and genetic information of 86 species of ‘placental’ mammals and is a step forward in the study of evolution. Our creationist source stated:


“Just you wait here a moment while I go get me my witch burning hat […] Jebadiah! Where you done gone put my witch burning hat?”


Mother “weasel-rat” more likely to be kept in a hamster cage than have her picture above the mantel-piece.
This ‘mother of mammals’ looks like a shrew with a long hairy tail or a cross between and rat and weasel leading to the name “weasel-rat” in some circles. The “weasel-rat” (ratus-weaselus) weighed no more than a few hundred grams and ate a nutritiously tasty diet of prehistoric insects.

After the dinosaurs negated the risk of having live young become a tasty snack by helpfully becoming extinct, the “weasel-rat” flourished. Through a long and drawn out process of evolution, these cuddly little mammals, led to homo-sapiens and over 5000 of our placental mammal cousins, including your uncle monkey. Unfortunately the “weasel-rat” does not link you to kangaroos or the amazing duck-billed platypus as they are not placental mammals and so could still be the product of design by a probably drunk, Australian, god.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.